ITINERARY PERJALANAN UMROH PLUS CITYTOUR DUBAI 9 hari

Sedikit meninggalkan permasalahan yang masih terjadi pada pendataan dapodik 2012 yang berakibat pada tersendatnya pencairan tunjangan tahun 2013 dan sebagainya. Alangkah baiknya para operator dan para ptk, terutama penerima tunjangan sudah mulai mempersiapkan diri untuk mengetahui kapan proses pendataan masuk kemudian data kita diolah termasuk saat kapan bisa diperbaiki terutama terkait tunjangan tahun 2014 agar permasalahan yang terjadi sebelumnya bisa dihindari.

 

Rencana 2014 terkait tunjangan :

    Semua penerbitan SK Tunjangan berdasarkan dapodik versi baru. (Dapodikdas 2013)
    Data yang digunakan untuk penerbitan SK tunjangan adalah :

    Data Semester  Genap  2013-2014 untuk pembayaran tunjangan periode januari sd juni 2014
    Data Semester  Ganjil 2014-2015 untuk pembayaran tunjangan periode juli sd desember 2014

Jan-Feb 2014 : Periode Updating Data

    Para Guru dipersilahkan melakukan pembaharuan data melalui Aplikasi dapodik untuk data semester 2 TA. 2013-2014.
    Sinkronisasi antara Server Dapodik dan Server P2TK Dikdas akan dilakukan secara rutin setiap hari.
    Para guru dipersilahkan melakukan pengecekan data melalui Halaman Verifikasi Guru (Info Guru)
    P2TK akan melakukan Penutupan Sinkronisasi (Closing) data pada tanggal 1 Maret 2014, maka sejak tanggal ini pembaharuan pada aplikasi dapodik untuk Tri Wulan 1 tidak akan masuk ke server P2TK Dikdas.
    Kesalahan pengentrian pada  aplikasi dapodik yang menyebabkan kerugian apapun pada Guru menjadi tanggung jawab Guru ybs, karena sudah diberikan waktu untuk pengecekan melalui lembar info guru.

Tgl 1-15 Maret 2014 : Periode Pengolahan Data TW1
P2Dikdas akan melakukan pengolahan sbb :

    Penghitungan jumlah jam mengajar
    Penghitungan jumlah murid
    Penghitungan jumlah jam rombel
    Pengecekan Data Sarana dan Prasarana (Perpustakaan dan laboratorium)
    Pengecekan Tugas Tambahan, dll

Hasil pengolahan akan menentukan :

    Nominasi penerima Aneka Tunjangan untuk semua kabupaten / kota
    Guru bersertifikat pendidik yang dapat di SK kan untuk mendapatkan hak bayar pada Triwulan 1 (jan-mar 2014)

16-23 Maret 2014 : Periode Pengusulan SK

    Operator Dinas Kab/Kota melakukan pengusulan untuk :

    Penerima Tunjangan Fungsional (Semester  1)
    Penerima Bantuan Kualifikasi Akademik (Semester 1)
    Penerima Tunjangan Guru Daerah Khusus (Triwulan 1)
    Penerima Tunjangan Profesi  (Triwulan 1)

    Dinas Provinsi melakukan kordinasi dengan Dinas Kab/kota.
    Operator Dinas Prov. melakukan Penyetujuan/Penolakan atas usulan kab/kota

24 -31 Maret 2014 : Periode Penerbitan SK

    P2TK Dikdas akan menerbitkan SK Tunjangan Profesi dan Aneka Tunjangan bagi guru guru yang dinyatakan memenuhi syarat memperoleh Tunjangan.
    Walaupun SK Penerima Tunjangan berlaku setahun, namun dalam proses pembayaran harus memperhatikan pemenuhan syarat penerima tunjangan, misalnya :

    Status Aktif guru (Aktif/Cuti/Wafat/Pensiun/dll)
    Status Kepegawaian (PNS/GTT/GTY/dll)

April 2014 : Periode Pembayaran TW1 & SMT1

    Penerima SK TP yang terbit pada bulan maret 2014 berhak menerima Tunjangan Profesi untuk Triwulan 1 (januari-maret), kecuali untuk Guru yang wafat/pensiun/cuti di tengah triwulan. Jumlah hak bulan disesuaikan dengan masa aktif. Misalnya pensiun maret 2014 maka ybs berhak 2 bulan saja.
    Penerima SK-TF yang terbit pada bulan maret 2014 berhak menerima T. Fungsional untuk Semester 1 (periode januari sd juni 2014).
    Penerima SK-Tunjangan Kualifikasi yang terbit pada bulan maret 2014 berhak menerima T. Kualifikasi untuk Semester 1 (periode januari sd juni 2014).
    Penerima SK-Tunjangan Khusus yang terbit pada bulan maret 2014 berhak menerima T. Khusus untuk Triwulan 1 (periode januari sd Maret 2014)

Mei 2014 : Periode Updating Data Dapodik Susulan TW2
Pada bulan Mei 2014, P2TK Dikdas akan membuka kembali sinkronisasi dengan Server Dapodik. Hal ini untuk mengakomodasi pembaharuan data yang diakibatkan :

    Guru tidak mendapat jam pada Triwulan 1 namun dapat memenuhi pada Triwulan 2.
    Adanya peralihan jam karena Guru Mutasi, Wafat atau Pensiun setelah Triwulan 1.

1-14 Juni 2014 : Periode Pengolahan Data Susulan TW2

    P2TK akan kembali melakukan Closing data pada tanggal 1 juni 2014 untuk data Dapodik TW2.
    P2TK akan melakukan pengolahan data dapodik yang masuk per 1 juni 2014.
    Hasil dari pengolahan data tersebut akan menentukan penerima Tunjangan Profesi pada TW 1 yang tidak berhak lagi menerima pada TW2 yang diakibatkan :

    Kehilangan jam mengajar pada TW2.
    Tidak aktif menurut dapodik karena sakit, pensiun, wafat, cuti, dll
    Dibatalkan tunjangannya karena sebab sebab tertentu oleh dinas kabupaten/Kota

    Hasil dari pengolahan data tersebut akan menentukan penerima Tunjangan Profesi

    Guru bersertifikat pendidik  yang yang belum mendapat  SKTP pada bulan maret (tidak mendapat tunjangan TW1), namun sudah memenuhi syarat untuk TW2.
    Nominasi Tunjangan Khusus yang dapat menggantikan penerima tunjangan yang dibatalkan pada TW 2 karena sebab-sebab tertentu.
    Penerima Tunjangan Khusus pada TW 1 yang tidak berhak lagi menerima pada TW2 yang diakibatkan hal yang sama dengan Tunjangan Profesi.

15-23 Juni : Periode Pengusulan Susulan
Dinas Kab/kota melakukan pengusulan untuk Penerima Tunjangan Profesi susulan.
Dinas Kab/kota melakukan pengusulan untuk Penerima Tunjangan Khusus Pengganti
Dinas Provinsi melakukan Kordinasi dengan Dinas Kab/Kota
Dinas Provinsi melakukan penyetujuan/penolakan usulan dinas Kab/Kota

23-31 Juni :Periode Penerbitan SK Susulan TW2

    P2TK Diknas akan menerbitkan SK Tunjangan Profesi bagi guru guru yang dinyatakan memenuhi syarat memperoleh Tunjangan pada TW2 namun belum di sk kan pada TW1.
    P2TK akan menerbikan SK tunjangan Khusus pengganti untuk TW2 (jika ada)

Juli 2014 : Periode Pembayaran TW2

    Penerima SK TP yang terbit pada bulan Maret 2014 berhak menerima Tunjangan Profesi untuk Triwulan 2 (april-juni), kecuali untuk Guru yang dinyatakan kehilangan haknya akibat tidak memenuhi syarat, misalnya kehilangan jam mengajar pada TW2, wafat, pensiun atau sebab lain sesuai peraturan yang berlaku.
    Penerima SK TP yang terbit pada bulan Juni 2014 berhak menerima Tunjangan Profesi untuk Triwulan 2 (april-juni), kecuali untuk Guru yang wafat/pensiun/cuti di tengah triwulan. Jumlah hak bulan disesuaikan dengan masa aktif. Misalnya pensiun Juni 2014 maka ybs berhak 2 bulan saja.
    Penerima SK-Tunjangan Khusus yang terbit pada bulan maret 2014 namun dibatalkan karena sebab sebab tertentu tidak berhak mendapatkan tunjangan untuk Triwulan 2.
    Penerima SK Tunjangan Khusus Pengganti berhak menerima Tunjangan (hanya) untuk TW2 saja.

 

JADWAL OLAH DATA UNTUK PENCAIRAN TUNJANGAN DIKDAS 2014

UNITED NATIONS — Wearing pinstripes and a pince-nez, Staffan de Mistura, the United Nations envoy for Syria, arrived at the Security Council one Tuesday afternoon in February and announced that President Bashar al-Assad had agreed to halt airstrikes over Aleppo. Would the rebels, Mr. de Mistura suggested, agree to halt their shelling?

What he did not announce, but everyone knew by then, was that the Assad government had begun a military offensive to encircle opposition-held enclaves in Aleppo and that fierce fighting was underway. It would take only a few days for rebel leaders, having pushed back Syrian government forces, to outright reject Mr. de Mistura’s proposed freeze in the fighting, dooming the latest diplomatic overture on Syria.

Diplomacy is often about appearing to be doing something until the time is ripe for a deal to be done.

 

 

Now, with Mr. Assad’s forces having suffered a string of losses on the battlefield and the United States reaching at least a partial rapprochement with Mr. Assad’s main backer, Iran, Mr. de Mistura is changing course. Starting Monday, he is set to hold a series of closed talks in Geneva with the warring sides and their main supporters. Iran will be among them.

In an interview at United Nations headquarters last week, Mr. de Mistura hinted that the changing circumstances, both military and diplomatic, may have prompted various backers of the war to question how much longer the bloodshed could go on.

“Will that have an impact in accelerating the willingness for a political solution? We need to test it,” he said. “The Geneva consultations may be a good umbrella for testing that. It’s an occasion for asking everyone, including the government, if there is any new way that they are looking at a political solution, as they too claim they want.”

He said he would have a better assessment at the end of June, when he expects to wrap up his consultations. That coincides with the deadline for a final agreement in the Iran nuclear talks.

Advertisement

Whether a nuclear deal with Iran will pave the way for a new opening on peace talks in Syria remains to be seen. Increasingly, though, world leaders are explicitly linking the two, with the European Union’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, suggesting last week that a nuclear agreement could spur Tehran to play “a major but positive role in Syria.”

It could hardly come soon enough. Now in its fifth year, the Syrian war has claimed 220,000 lives, prompted an exodus of more than three million refugees and unleashed jihadist groups across the region. “This conflict is producing a question mark in many — where is it leading and whether this can be sustained,” Mr. de Mistura said.

Part Italian, part Swedish, Mr. de Mistura has worked with the United Nations for more than 40 years, but he is more widely known for his dapper style than for any diplomatic coups. Syria is by far the toughest assignment of his career — indeed, two of the organization’s most seasoned diplomats, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan, tried to do the job and gave up — and critics have wondered aloud whether Mr. de Mistura is up to the task.

He served as a United Nations envoy in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Lebanon, where a former minister recalled, with some scorn, that he spent many hours sunbathing at a private club in the hills above Beirut. Those who know him say he has a taste for fine suits and can sometimes speak too soon and too much, just as they point to his diplomatic missteps and hyperbole.

They cite, for instance, a news conference in October, when he raised the specter of Srebrenica, where thousands of Muslims were massacred in 1995 during the Balkans war, in warning that the Syrian border town of Kobani could fall to the Islamic State. In February, he was photographed at a party in Damascus, the Syrian capital, celebrating the anniversary of the Iranian revolution just as Syrian forces, aided by Iran, were pummeling rebel-held suburbs of Damascus; critics seized on that as evidence of his coziness with the government.

Mouin Rabbani, who served briefly as the head of Mr. de Mistura’s political affairs unit and has since emerged as one of his most outspoken critics, said Mr. de Mistura did not have the background necessary for the job. “This isn’t someone well known for his political vision or political imagination, and his closest confidants lack the requisite knowledge and experience,” Mr. Rabbani said.

As a deputy foreign minister in the Italian government, Mr. de Mistura was tasked in 2012 with freeing two Italian marines detained in India for shooting at Indian fishermen. He made 19 trips to India, to little effect. One marine was allowed to return to Italy for medical reasons; the other remains in India.

He said he initially turned down the Syria job when the United Nations secretary general approached him last August, only to change his mind the next day, after a sleepless, guilt-ridden night.

Mr. de Mistura compared his role in Syria to that of a doctor faced with a terminally ill patient. His goal in brokering a freeze in the fighting, he said, was to alleviate suffering. He settled on Aleppo as the location for its “fame,” he said, a decision that some questioned, considering that Aleppo was far trickier than the many other lesser-known towns where activists had negotiated temporary local cease-fires.

“Everybody, at least in Europe, are very familiar with the value of Aleppo,” Mr. de Mistura said. “So I was using that as an icebreaker.”

The cease-fire negotiations, to which he had devoted six months, fell apart quickly because of the government’s military offensive in Aleppo the very day of his announcement at the Security Council. Privately, United Nations diplomats said Mr. de Mistura had been manipulated. To this, Mr. de Mistura said only that he was “disappointed and concerned.”

Tarek Fares, a former rebel fighter, said after a recent visit to Aleppo that no Syrian would admit publicly to supporting Mr. de Mistura’s cease-fire proposal. “If anyone said they went to a de Mistura meeting in Gaziantep, they would be arrested,” is how he put it, referring to the Turkish city where negotiations between the two sides were held.

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon remains staunchly behind Mr. de Mistura’s efforts. His defenders point out that he is at the center of one of the world’s toughest diplomatic problems, charged with mediating a conflict in which two of the world’s most powerful nations — Russia, which supports Mr. Assad, and the United States, which has called for his ouster — remain deadlocked.

R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who now teaches at Harvard, credited Mr. de Mistura for trying to negotiate a cease-fire even when the chances of success were exceedingly small — and the chances of a political deal even smaller. For his efforts to work, Professor Burns argued, the world powers will first have to come to an agreement of their own.

“He needs the help of outside powers,” he said. “It starts with backers of Assad. That’s Russia and Iran. De Mistura is there, waiting.”

With Iran Talks, a Tangled Path to Ending Syria’s War

Artikel lainnya »